Sega are interested in lowering customer value, I have seen this myself with the steam sale. They upped the price to £39.99 (from £29.99) days before a 60% off steam sale. After the sale was finished it was dropped to £29.99 again, standard price. That to me is the sign of a scummy company, one that will quite happily lower customer value for personal gain. Practically every company will get away with something like this if they can. If people actually said "i'm not buying this" (which will never ever happen) then the attitude would change as money is all they care about. We are the ones who provide food on the table. Companys are more than happy to abuse that trust. Mostly thanks to console gamers.
Last edited by MrBoBo1; 03-01-2012 at 03:40 PM.
Last edited by Feud; 03-01-2012 at 04:00 PM.
When you say "premium" your saying content that has been developed in mind, at or around the same time of the main development and with-held at launch and months after release, to be resold, giving the perception to users this is fresh content, which in fact, it isn't, it's content that existed on launch. And getting angry at that makes you pathetic and spoilt? Really? I don't agree at all. In fact being aware and actively trying to do something about it makes you not ignorant in my opinion as well as defending consumers.
Something we didn't bring up was the issue of multiplayer. The content is chopped up without the ability other than buying the entire game again to get the (most likely) withheld content and no guarantee of it being sold down the road. And at that, used in multiplayer possibly giving special advantage to specific players such as certian abilities. With steam accounts linked to a single account, re-buying the entire game again may not be an option either. So pay to win without the possibly option of getting to pay in the first place.
Last edited by MrBoBo1; 03-01-2012 at 05:17 PM.
I'd be very happy if they released the bonus/exclusive clans as a DLC sometime after the game goes live
Proud owner of
-- Rome: Total War Gold Edition
-- Medieval II: Total War & Kingdoms
-- Total War: SHOGUN 2 (all DLC included)
Not so proud of
-- Rome Expansions
-- Empire & Napoleon: Total War GOTY
It's childish to ask that you get more for your money? Isn't that what CA is doing here? Putting in the same amount of money as it would take to include the clans but asking to get more in return for it?
To be honest, these clans being kept as preorder doesn't bother me that much. This is a game about civil war- the different factions won't be that different. This isn't a whole lot of content, but the idea of it and where it could lead (for instance, Mass Effect basically requiring the paid DLC) bothers me, although I would be surprised to see CA doing something more than a small reward for preorderers. What really bothers me that I'm seeing, though, is the idea that we should just take what we're given and not ask for more or complain.
Edit: Also, the reasons CA has given in their official thread satisfy me further.
Last edited by Rewjeo; 03-01-2012 at 08:13 PM.
I think it is a very difficult topic we're talking about. On the one hand I can understand why CA/SEGA/retailer think that they need some sort of "incentive". Even different incentives for each retailer. On the other hand I can understand people getting angry about this too.
The best solution would probably be if they would only create incentives which don't change the conent of the game (no units, factions, etc.) and more things like the soundtrack and so on. Then nobody would feel like being ripped of, but I guess this will never happen. The more vital the incentives are the more money they can make.
A good solution would be if the pre-order incentives weren't different. This would give us customers the feeling that we can really decide what we get (because we want it or not).
The worst situation is the one we have now. We simply don't know whether we will have the chance to get these ("premium") factions after the release as DLC or not. We don't even know if they're worth to pre-order FotS.
But there is one thing that makes even me angry. If I pre-order a game I pay the highest prize there is and I get an "incentive" because I decided to buy it even before release. But if the "incentives" get released afterwards WHY did I buy it for the highest prize in the first place. A simple time advantage is no advantage for me.
Btw I pre-ordered Shogun 2 bought the DLCs and I realised in the end that other people can get all of this just for the money I payed for Shogun 2 without the DLCs.
Maybe a conclusion by all this could be that for pre-ordering you get a prize-decrease for all DLCs which'll be released later (some sort of code/coupon). So there won't be any content which you can't get. Or you slightly smaller prize-decrease and the system of today with an incentive (but it has to be sure that all incentives become released as DLC!).
What do you guys think about this?
Isn't it entirely possible that if it wasn't for pre-order incentives that the 3 clans in question wouldn't have been developed in the first place?
I agree with your idea humbleservant, a slight price decrease would be very fair. Probably too fair!
So from my perspective CA is LOSING revenue from this arrangement - because I'm pretty darn sure most of the other STW2 fans like myself would happily pay an extra $10 for some limited edition all faction bundle with a ****py pewter katana (you know you want one).
As a result, I'm not pre-ordering, and buying on release.