Does anyone have any issues with this stance and the races that can use it?
My experience has not been a happy one and I think it needs to be reworked slightly. I will give you an example, I was playing a Dawi campaign last night as Grombrindal, the vampires of course started to dominate and basically blitzkrieged south into the badlands and mountains and destroyed the greenies.
I decided enough is enough, woodelves factions are going against them in the west, time for pressure in the east. They besiege Karaz with 3 stacks and I move Grombrindal in underway stance for support to move faster. The vampires notice me and send 3 stacks to attack him this is where I start to get upset.
The battle is not in the underway for some reason.....and for that matter I honestly think the underway stance should work like beastpath/ambush stance, races that don't use the underway can't see you on the map , only other races that use it can see you and if indeed you are engaged, which I think top dwellers should not be able to engage you in that stance, the battle should take place in the under way.
Basically by being engaged and then pulled to the surface I am most likely going to lose the battle, I retreat, and for some reason I am no longer in the underway stance....go figure. It makes no logical sense to me.....
Opinions on the matter anyone?
Most peoples' response to Rome II expansion...."Please Sir may I have some more"......
My Massagetae, battered and bloody, but undefeated in the field! True masters of battle
! Masters of campaigning on the other hand, unfortunately not.......:(