Karak Eight Peaks

SubjectEighteen

Does anyone know if they ever fixed the issue with Karak Eight Peaks not being you're capital if you capture it as Belegar? I wanted to start a campaign with him after the new update but I haven't been able to find anything on wether or not they fixed that problem. It was extremely frustrating to capture Karak Eight Peaks and then not be able to trade with anyone because your capital was still Karak Izor.







*Edited for typos*

Petromir

Not heard about them making it move, but in ME would the lack of regional occupation render the trade part less of an issue?

SubjectEighteen

It would, but only if you attack factions that would better serve as allies. Its not the biggest issue, just a minor frustration and a little immersion breaking for Belegar to not move his capital to the place his entire campaign revolves around.

RikRiorik

If you capture the new Sartosa would that add a sea route at least?

Not sure if it is likely to leave Tilean hands though. Havent played much since the newest DLC.

SakuraHeinz

That would be nice, just to feel like you accomplished something huge, and the same for skarsnik please.

Pilthoid

If you were to lose your original capital then wouldn't 8 Peaks become your new one? I'm not sure how the game adjudicates that. Maybe it would default to the next powerful capital you own?

kgmi

Vlad has the same issue, when you capture Drakenhof and later Altdorf, those cities should become his capital, at least as an option.

Itharus

Remember back in the day when the further away from your capital settlements were, the more unrest they took; and back then you could relocate your capital?

I swear sometimes that Medieval 1 was potentially the most complicated Total War actually made -- and it predates the fancy 3D map with movement ranges and what not!

TheShiroOfDalton

Itharus said:

Remember back in the day when the further away from your capital settlements were, the more unrest they took; and back then you could relocate your capital?

I swear sometimes that Medieval 1 was potentially the most complicated Total War actually made -- and it predates the fancy 3D map with movement ranges and what not!

Considering Med1 didn't discourage you from spamming once you could and had the hilariously broken individual tax bar to make sure this moment came early...no, it wasn't complicated at al. It had some nifty mechanics, but it wasn't a gut-bustingly hard game.

Itharus

I swear Ephraim, you are like my personal nemesis on these forums sometimes.

Ol_Nessie

Itharus said:

I swear Ephraim, you are like my personal nemesis on these forums sometimes.

He just likes picking fights. He'll argue any position just to feel superior

MrJade

Itharus said:

Remember back in the day when the further away from your capital settlements were, the more unrest they took; and back then you could relocate your capital?

I swear sometimes that Medieval 1 was potentially the most complicated Total War actually made -- and it predates the fancy 3D map with movement ranges and what not!

Shogun I to Empire was a steady increase in complexity.

Not all of the features transitioned forwards, but each was still complicated. Shogun II, while amazing, didn't iterate on Empire's complexity, and Rome II onwards went backwards.

Itharus

Oh, Rome 2 has tips AND quotes. Just checked the other day.