Warhammer 3 legendary lords overview: Ku'gath Plaguefather

Bies#4376

#324448

This guy never had a model and it shows; I have no idea how you could represent a Great Unclean One on a palanquin. As cool of an idea as it is, Great Unclean Ones are already one of the biggest units in the game and making one bigger would be insane.

Draculasaurus

I generally favor the idea that LLs should offer some variety that the generic lords don't. Assumign we got a Daemons Undivided faction, and assuming the WHII trends continue, we may only get four DoC LLs. My hope is we'd get the full selection of generic lords; Bloodthirsters, Great Unclean Ones, Lords of Change, and Keepers of Secrets, but then the LLs wouldn't just be named versions of those.

So I think I'd prefer Epidemius or something as a Nurgle LL, as he's a bit more distinct from a generic Great Unclean One.

[Deleted User]

The user and all related content has been deleted.

Timpeyo#7210

I hope they create somthing similar to this for lords and hero's to ride

Some_Scribe

In Naggaroth it was cursed as Jharihn, in Lustria feared as Xochitataliav, in destroyed Tilea hated as Kisveraldo the Foul-breathed, in distant Cathay reviled as Cha-Zin-Fa the Ever-pustulent. In the Empire it had earned the moniker Ku’gath the Plaguefather, and its ministrations had ever been most virulent in those lands.

(The Fall of Altdorf, Chapter 17)

Canuovea#6291

He is a Demon. He should be a LL for the Demons of Chaos.

Beast_of_Guanyin#8747

Canuovea said:

He is a Demon. He should be a LL for the Demons of Chaos.

Yep. Greater Demons should be DoC exclusive.

Mad_D0c_#1516

Draculasaurus said:

I generally favor the idea that LLs should offer some variety that the generic lords don't. Assumign we got a Daemons Undivided faction, and assuming the WHII trends continue, we may only get four DoC LLs. My hope is we'd get the full selection of generic lords; Bloodthirsters, Great Unclean Ones, Lords of Change, and Keepers of Secrets, but then the LLs wouldn't just be named versions of those.

So I think I'd prefer Epidemius or something as a Nurgle LL, as he's a bit more distinct from a generic Great Unclean One.

Hopefully monogods at the end of game 3 cycle with a minimum of 2 LL for Each DoC and WoC god. And like someone said with Archaon and Kokek as a undivided option.

Beast_of_Guanyin#8747

_Mad_D0c_ said:

Draculasaurus said:

I generally favor the idea that LLs should offer some variety that the generic lords don't. Assumign we got a Daemons Undivided faction, and assuming the WHII trends continue, we may only get four DoC LLs. My hope is we'd get the full selection of generic lords; Bloodthirsters, Great Unclean Ones, Lords of Change, and Keepers of Secrets, but then the LLs wouldn't just be named versions of those.

So I think I'd prefer Epidemius or something as a Nurgle LL, as he's a bit more distinct from a generic Great Unclean One.

Hopefully monogods at the end of game 3 cycle with a minimum of 2 LL for Each DoC and WoC god. And like someone said with Archaon and Kokek as a undivided option.

2 in 1 campaign packs would be ideal for those. They're cheap to make.

I'd have greater Demon LL's for DoC then heralds beside a mortal counterpart for the CP.

Boombastek

And with all this cool type of LL and units ppl still saying undivided chaos is good option?

With 1 LL each god, it just poor representation.

Beast_of_Guanyin#8747

Boombastek said:

And with all this cool type of LL and units ppl still saying undivided chaos is good option?

With 1 LL each god, it just poor representation.

Representing them as they were on the TT isn't "poor" it's accurate. DoC were undivided on the TT, and they should be in TWW.

Federykx99

Boombastek said:

And with all this cool type of LL and units ppl still saying undivided chaos is good option?

With 1 LL each god, it just poor representation.

Oh boy
Here we go again

Boombastek

Vanilla_Gorilla said:

Boombastek said:

And with all this cool type of LL and units ppl still saying undivided chaos is good option?

With 1 LL each god, it just poor representation.

Representing them as they were on the TT isn't "poor" it's accurate. DoC were undivided on the TT, and they should be in TWW.

TT you mean later GW representation of split chaos race each on separete race. According TT all OK.

#326161

Giveaway412 said:

This guy never had a model and it shows; I have no idea how you could represent a Great Unclean One on a palanquin. As cool of an idea as it is, Great Unclean Ones are already one of the biggest units in the game and making one bigger would be insane.

There are tons of models http://www.frontlinegames.net/catalog/minaturetable_top_games-age_of_sigmar_sealed/daemons_of_nurgle_great_unclean_one/1091903

lordreaven448

I'm going to be honest, I don't think we're getting Ku'gath. I think we're getting Rotigus from AoS.

My reasoning is very simple, the Great Unclean one got a new kit last year, and CA will most definitely use that model. Rotigus would be a few small changes to the base GUO model. I expect CA to take the easy way out.

Draculasaurus

_Mad_D0c_ said:

Draculasaurus said:

I generally favor the idea that LLs should offer some variety that the generic lords don't. Assumign we got a Daemons Undivided faction, and assuming the WHII trends continue, we may only get four DoC LLs. My hope is we'd get the full selection of generic lords; Bloodthirsters, Great Unclean Ones, Lords of Change, and Keepers of Secrets, but then the LLs wouldn't just be named versions of those.

So I think I'd prefer Epidemius or something as a Nurgle LL, as he's a bit more distinct from a generic Great Unclean One.

Hopefully monogods at the end of game 3 cycle with a minimum of 2 LL for Each DoC and WoC god. And like someone said with Archaon and Kokek as a undivided option.

Paaaaaaaass

Beast_of_Guanyin#8747

Boombastek said:

Vanilla_Gorilla said:

Boombastek said:

And with all this cool type of LL and units ppl still saying undivided chaos is good option?

With 1 LL each god, it just poor representation.

Representing them as they were on the TT isn't "poor" it's accurate. DoC were undivided on the TT, and they should be in TWW.

TT you mean later GW representation of split chaos race each on separete race. According TT all OK.

Huh?

This game is based on WHFB. In WHFB DoC were an undivided race. Thus the accurate way to represent them is as undivided, just as they were on the TT. If you're referring to AoS that's a completely different game. In completely different game the gods are still not independent.

Draculasaurus

EDIT: wrong thread

[Deleted User]

The user and all related content has been deleted.