Welcome

Please register for Total War Access to use the forums. If you're an existing user, your forum details will be merged with Total War Access if you register with the same email or username. For more information please read our FAQ’s here.

Categories

What’s the official CA’s stance on Araby?

2»

Comments

  • Tibi088Tibi088 Registered Users Posts: 178
    Azurian said:

    Tibi088 said:

    I havent heard that yet. I was pretty sure that Araby would come sooner or later and was looking really forward to it - mostly because of their placeholder comment in regards of the crusaders around the release of the game. Im really saddened by this news. Still its better to know than waiting for something that will (most likely) never come. It would have been even better if they had told us earlier instead of letting false hope build. With this the number of things I really look forward to (with any decent chance of happening) had dwindled down to Kislev.

    Can you imagine what effect will be when they are created?
    Just imagine:
    The Lordpacks are coming to an end, the CA announce that in fact there is one more DLC left and this is not a Lordpack, and literally on the Announcement day it is announced that it is Arabia.

    How do you think? will it be a bomb? Will players buy this? Will this raise reviews for the game? They will snatch huge benefits from this step.
    And at the same time, annoying fans of camels will leave them alone for a while.
    I would be perfectly happy with that but also really surprised after those statements.
  • kelembribor#4603kelembribor#4603 Registered Users Posts: 790
    edited November 2019
    Something along these lines maybe (jk)




  • Crossil#2134Crossil#2134 Registered Users Posts: 14,927

    “As it stands” .

    Translation: "It would take a serious shift in our design/policy/plans for Araby to be added at some point."
    Furthermore, I consider that Daemon Prince must be removed.
  • IamNotArobot#8850IamNotArobot#8850 Registered Users Posts: 5,760
    Crossil said:

    “As it stands” .

    Translation: "It would take a serious shift in our design/policy/plans for Araby to be added at some point."
    Something like GW's old world revived! Lets just hope at least :)
    *Justice, cats and CONFEDERATION ENABLED for the Tomb Kings and Vampire Coast! feat mummies and Apophas.
    *Exclusive DLCs for Tomb Kings, Vampire Coast, BM, CW and WE! #DLCsAreRacesToo
    *Remaster all WH1 and WH2 faction icons for WH3!
    *Ogre Kingdoms core race or death!
    *Bring back settlement conquering artworks!
    *Gnoblar Carpet for Greesus
    *Improve UI


  • HeresyHoundHeresyHound Registered Users Posts: 8,285

    Crossil said:

    “As it stands” .

    Translation: "It would take a serious shift in our design/policy/plans for Araby to be added at some point."
    Something like GW's old world revived! Lets just hope at least :)
    Please stop. That won't even see the light of day for at the very minimum 3 years. And even then they aren't going to focus on the no name factions first.
  • Bonutz#3949Bonutz#3949 Registered Users Posts: 5,888
    Basically Araby is dead and buried, unless CA says otherwise. Put it out of your mind for now.
    I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass...and I’m all out of bubblegum.
  • Captain_Rex#1635Captain_Rex#1635 Registered Users Posts: 40,879
    CA never lost a direct word about any Minor races in an official announcement except Araby and Kislev.

    1. We don’t have plans to make Araby in general.

    2. Sorry it’s not Kislev (Norsca announcement)

    If there would be the slightest possibility to maybe release Araby one day, CA would’ve been silent about it. But they specifically stated that they don’t have plans for Araby in general. Something they have never done before! Araby will never come! We don’t know the reason, the reason also doesn’t matter. Araby is dead, buried and rotten. Let it go...

    About Kislev:
    “Sorry it’s not Kislev” implies that CA already knew how much we all demand Kislev back in game 1. Mentioning Kislev that way makes it kinda obvious that they have other plans for it. Sorry it’s not Kislev (this time).
    They also could’ve said something like: “we know how much all of you want Kislev but we currently/generally don’t have plans for it.”
    But they didn’t.

    Kislev = extremely likely
    Araby = it’s dead Jim
    Summon the Elector Counts!
  • AurawallAurawall Registered Users Posts: 327
    I think Norsca killed Araby. I mean, they already have mammoths. All Araby has left is carpets and camels.

    And camels spit.
  • Neodeinos#5871Neodeinos#5871 Registered Users Posts: 16,743
    Aurawall said:

    I think Norsca killed Araby. I mean, they already have mammoths. All Araby has left is carpets and camels.

    And camels spit.

    Soooo because Norsca has Mammoths they decided to not make Araby ? That's dumb.
  • AurawallAurawall Registered Users Posts: 327
    neodeinos said:

    Aurawall said:

    I think Norsca killed Araby. I mean, they already have mammoths. All Araby has left is carpets and camels.

    And camels spit.

    Soooo because Norsca has Mammoths they decided to not make Araby ? That's dumb.
    Who knows. Maybe there is a limit on proboscideans?

    You want Wulfrik to cry or something?
Sign In or Register to comment.