I mean LM are the game 2 faction featured the the last time 3 LPs back and Drycha would be the character you could create easily a story where LM and WE get into a fight.
Yes its unlikely and not what I want but, we all could agree, HE are the unlikeliest choice of all, featured allready in the last LP and has the smallest rivalry chance with HE (even there are conflicts in the lore). While a lot of people dont want DE or skaven.
So...
Tettoeko the Astro mage vs Drycha the Briar maven
The former will bring the highly wanted troglodon the other most likely only beasts, sorites and walking wood, so all Elves would be flc.
What do you think? Worst case or even better than the standard predictions?
4 ·
Comments
- Report
0 · Disagree Agree- Report
1 · Disagree Agree- Report
7 · Disagree Agree- Report
8 · Disagree AgreeDrycha despite having some really interesting mechanics and lore would still be good as an FLC like I think we'll see. Tetto'eko is more DLC worthy but Lizardmen need a good enemy. Even Beastmen would be good for them because at least that's a Chaotic Faction.
- Report
4 · Disagree AgreeLike I said tettoeko vs drycha is not what I want but beside all the moulder or DE vs WE discussion its strange we never thought about this.
Moonclaw vs Tettoeko
Moon son vs moon destroyer woukd be very fitting
And oxyotl vs DoC would ve a classic rivalry, so oxyotl will be a game 3 safe bet.
- Report
3 · Disagree Agreeits most likely skaven (moulder) which is a no brainer OR (with a small chance) DE. and i actually would prefer Tullaris on Ulthuan over Moulder
- Report
2 · Disagree AgreeI would absolutely LOVE Moonclaw VS Tetto'eko though. I think Taurox is the one everyone wants so he'd be the DLC lord but if Beastmen were to get a second LP I could easily see Moonclaw leading it. Jabberslythes would be incredibly fitting too considering Moonclaw is literally insane and Jabber's drive men insane. I like your idea here.
Oxyotl Vs A Daemon LL is a no brainer, fully expect it in game III as maybe the last DLC Lizardmen see. I as a fan of more content wouldn't cry about seeing 2 Lizard DLCs though.
- Report
3 · Disagree AgreeShe had fought beside Aenarion in the days of her youth, killing daemons, slaughtering the enemies of her people with wild abandon. She had cast spells and brewed poisons and worked out battle strategies for his armies. She had used her gift of visions to grant the elves victories innumerable.
The so-called high elves had forgotten that now, preferring to cast her as the villain in the simple-minded morality plays they so enjoyed since her son had sundered the realm. They had no idea what it had cost to win those battles back when all thought the world was ending, or the price she had paid for victory.
- Report
0 · Disagree AgreeIt seems like an impossible long-shot if you ask me.
There's no major WE vs Lizardman beef to exploit.
Lizzies also currently are tied for most lords.
- Report
1 · Disagree Agree- Report
1 · Disagree Agree- Report
2 · Disagree Agree- Report
0 · Disagree Agree- Report
0 · Disagree Agree1. Drycha would be in the lord pack to the exclusion of either the Sisters of Twilight or Ariel.
2. A Lizardmen lord pack now pretty much denies them the possibility of ever getting a rework in game 3.
For the love of god, no.
- Report
2 · Disagree AgreeBringing the darker malevolent spirits of the forest too life and perhaps Coeddil in some way showing the real threats deep in the forest.
I'm really intrigued what these unique units will be like along side her if she's the flc and what mechanic she will have. Nice idea tho
- Report
0 · Disagree Agree- Report
0 · Disagree AgreeLizardmen because they deserve a proper campaign mechanic and I like Oxy and Tetto.
What I feel is more fair:
A Skaven or Dark Elf lord.
What I feel is most likely:
Throt and Clan Moulder.
- Report
3 · Disagree Agree- Report
7 · Disagree AgreeYES YES THAT GOOD !
- Report
0 · Disagree Agree- Report
2 · Disagree AgreeIdeally Drycha + Araloth. This way the WE would end up with 2x gods 2x trees and 2x elves
- Report
2 · Disagree AgreeWE: Orion, Durthu, Sisters, Ariel, Drycha, Araloth
Beastmen: Khazrak, Malagor, Morghur, Taurox, Moonclaw, Ghorros
Bretonnia: Louen, Fork-Master, Enchantress, Repanse, Bohemond, Mallobaude
- Report
4 · Disagree Agree- Report
0 · Disagree Agree- Report
1 · Disagree Agree- Report
2 · Disagree AgreeI buy lord packs for the individual lords, units, faction mechanics, and starting positions. To which starting positions is now often the primary reason I play any lord. When it came down to Eltharion vs Imrik, I like Imrik more 100% solely more because of start position.
That said, CA does the rivalries for advertisement. Specifically to the masses. Not as much us, many of us here are avid collectors that will hover it up just for completionists sake or because we're a fan of the individual race such as Wood Elf fans.
Which is why I don't think it would be WE vs LM in that arrangement. I'm not feeling the advertisement campaign for it. Why they dragged Markus, a character in canon to be against far flung expeditions or making new enemies for the Empire going on a LM hunt. Cause a hunter guy going after lizards jives with people who know nothing about Warhammer, little, or just don't care about the lore that much.
- Report
4 · Disagree AgreeWelp with the choices we got this seems likely all though they could do a and pack.
Which will have either lm or HE and WE working togather similar to how paris and hector kind of does in troy. Ideally it would have been brets and WE but CA confirmed it will not be brets.
#givemoreunitsforbrettonia, my bret dlc
- Report
0 · Disagree AgreeIt is going to be Skaven vs the WE, probably Elkhorn's of ages involved. and another WE FLC probably Drycha as they hinted.
What is interesting is actually what comes after, u have DE, Dwarves, BM and Chaos as potential candidates.
- Report
0 · Disagree Agree- Report
2 · Disagree Agree