Welcome

Please register for Total War Access to use the forums. If you're an existing user, your forum details will be merged with Total War Access if you register with the same email or username. For more information please read our FAQ’s here.

Categories

Just another Warhammer and CA Time Table Prediction

13»

Comments

  • DeadpoolSW#7283DeadpoolSW#7283 Registered Users Posts: 3,179

    JungleElf said:

    Surge_2 said:

    Brizthom said:



    Why would half the game 3 map be the game 1/2 map?

    Because there's no point playing as Chaos if you don't get to invade the good guys.
    That's what the Immortal Empires map's for- I don't want to buy a game that's 50% what I already own.
    So you don't play Mortal Empires or you didn't own Game 1?
    Yes I own game 1, which is why I don't want to buy game 3 if it's 50% what I already own- I'll have Immortal Empires to play there, game 3's map should be almost all new land (with some of the east ME map in)
    IF parts of the Old World are included, it will most likely just be a part and heavily feature new settlements, routes and maybe even some new environs to battle in. There's no doubting that new areas will be the focus, though.

    This map was quite a nice fan-take on it:
    https://forums.totalwar.com/discussion/252843/updated-total-war-warhammer-3-theoretical-map-1-1/p1
    That's good, but it should go a bit further east to get the whole or most of the mountains of mourn.

    A bit more of the chaos wastes aswell.
    I don't see them do another Vortex and Immortal Empires structure. It means you have to update 2 maps, instead of offering the option to turn off story mode for a full sandbox experiance. Most players prefer to play Immortal Empires instead of Vortex and I fully expect one giant map (I believe they also said it would be "the biggest map". I think the Darklands will certainly be part of the map and represented, but as part of a bigger map.

    Theres still allot to add for game 1 and 2 factions that would sell allot better than Lord Packs for Ogre's and Chaos Dwarfs. Think of Verminlord, Valten, Fat Daemons, Gorbad/Gorfang, Election Counts, Lizards, Dwarf Airships and LL, DoW, High Elves; Korvik and Arsarnil ect ect.
    I see them doing it, since they said they're doing it.
    Nagash will rule again!Justice for Araby, Albion, Amazons, Halflings, Nippon, Ind, Khuresh & the Hobgoblin Khanate!
  • JungleElf#8229JungleElf#8229 Registered Users Posts: 7,155

    JungleElf said:

    Surge_2 said:

    Brizthom said:



    Why would half the game 3 map be the game 1/2 map?

    Because there's no point playing as Chaos if you don't get to invade the good guys.
    That's what the Immortal Empires map's for- I don't want to buy a game that's 50% what I already own.
    So you don't play Mortal Empires or you didn't own Game 1?
    Yes I own game 1, which is why I don't want to buy game 3 if it's 50% what I already own- I'll have Immortal Empires to play there, game 3's map should be almost all new land (with some of the east ME map in)
    IF parts of the Old World are included, it will most likely just be a part and heavily feature new settlements, routes and maybe even some new environs to battle in. There's no doubting that new areas will be the focus, though.

    This map was quite a nice fan-take on it:
    https://forums.totalwar.com/discussion/252843/updated-total-war-warhammer-3-theoretical-map-1-1/p1
    That's good, but it should go a bit further east to get the whole or most of the mountains of mourn.

    A bit more of the chaos wastes aswell.
    I don't see them do another Vortex and Immortal Empires structure. It means you have to update 2 maps, instead of offering the option to turn off story mode for a full sandbox experiance. Most players prefer to play Immortal Empires instead of Vortex and I fully expect one giant map (I believe they also said it would be "the biggest map". I think the Darklands will certainly be part of the map and represented, but as part of a bigger map.

    Theres still allot to add for game 1 and 2 factions that would sell allot better than Lord Packs for Ogre's and Chaos Dwarfs. Think of Verminlord, Valten, Fat Daemons, Gorbad/Gorfang, Election Counts, Lizards, Dwarf Airships and LL, DoW, High Elves; Korvik and Arsarnil ect ect.
    I see them doing it, since they said they're doing it.
    But there will be two maps, still. CA confirmed to do a narrative campaign map on every launch-version. The combined sandbox-map is a big bonus to all who've bought every entry of the trilogy.

    And, yes, the Immortal Empires map will probably add a lot of the game 3 zones (but a bit downsized) and adress player feedback to incorporate more of the left-out parts shown in the Vortex campaign.
  • DendrofielDendrofiel Registered Users Posts: 103
    JungleElf said:

    JungleElf said:

    Surge_2 said:

    Brizthom said:



    Why would half the game 3 map be the game 1/2 map?

    Because there's no point playing as Chaos if you don't get to invade the good guys.
    That's what the Immortal Empires map's for- I don't want to buy a game that's 50% what I already own.
    So you don't play Mortal Empires or you didn't own Game 1?
    Yes I own game 1, which is why I don't want to buy game 3 if it's 50% what I already own- I'll have Immortal Empires to play there, game 3's map should be almost all new land (with some of the east ME map in)
    IF parts of the Old World are included, it will most likely just be a part and heavily feature new settlements, routes and maybe even some new environs to battle in. There's no doubting that new areas will be the focus, though.

    This map was quite a nice fan-take on it:
    https://forums.totalwar.com/discussion/252843/updated-total-war-warhammer-3-theoretical-map-1-1/p1
    That's good, but it should go a bit further east to get the whole or most of the mountains of mourn.

    A bit more of the chaos wastes aswell.
    I don't see them do another Vortex and Immortal Empires structure. It means you have to update 2 maps, instead of offering the option to turn off story mode for a full sandbox experiance. Most players prefer to play Immortal Empires instead of Vortex and I fully expect one giant map (I believe they also said it would be "the biggest map". I think the Darklands will certainly be part of the map and represented, but as part of a bigger map.

    Theres still allot to add for game 1 and 2 factions that would sell allot better than Lord Packs for Ogre's and Chaos Dwarfs. Think of Verminlord, Valten, Fat Daemons, Gorbad/Gorfang, Election Counts, Lizards, Dwarf Airships and LL, DoW, High Elves; Korvik and Arsarnil ect ect.
    I see them doing it, since they said they're doing it.
    But there will be two maps, still. CA confirmed to do a narrative campaign map on every launch-version. The combined sandbox-map is a big bonus to all who've bought every entry of the trilogy.

    And, yes, the Immortal Empires map will probably add a lot of the game 3 zones (but a bit downsized) and adress player feedback to incorporate more of the left-out parts shown in the Vortex campaign.
    Ah really? Can you source me that statement? I never played the Vortex proper tbh. I did not have PC for part 2 at the start and now I just always play Mortal Empires. I think the incomplete and scaled down New World in Mortal Empires is quite lackluster and looks allot better in the Vortex. I think it's a bad idea to invest time in 2 seperate maps again and I rather see them create one full scale Mortal Empires map where you can be active on multiple fronts and map vision trough improved diplomacy.
  • Surge_2#1464Surge_2#1464 Registered Users Posts: 13,869

    Surge_2 said:

    Brizthom said:



    Why would half the game 3 map be the game 1/2 map?

    Because there's no point playing as Chaos if you don't get to invade the good guys.
    That's what the Immortal Empires map's for- I don't want to buy a game that's 50% what I already own.
    So you don't play Mortal Empires or you didn't own Game 1?
    Yes I own game 1, which is why I don't want to buy game 3 if it's 50% what I already own- I'll have Immortal Empires to play there, game 3's map should be almost all new land (with some of the east ME map in)
    Well, then I hope you enjoy Mountains, Wastes, a bit of Desert, a bit of Grasslands, and some Snow.
    Kneel

  • DendrofielDendrofiel Registered Users Posts: 103
    Surge_2 said:

    Surge_2 said:

    Brizthom said:



    Why would half the game 3 map be the game 1/2 map?

    Because there's no point playing as Chaos if you don't get to invade the good guys.
    That's what the Immortal Empires map's for- I don't want to buy a game that's 50% what I already own.
    So you don't play Mortal Empires or you didn't own Game 1?
    Yes I own game 1, which is why I don't want to buy game 3 if it's 50% what I already own- I'll have Immortal Empires to play there, game 3's map should be almost all new land (with some of the east ME map in)
    Well, then I hope you enjoy Mountains, Wastes, a bit of Desert, a bit of Grasslands, and some Snow.
    Yeah exacly. Also only CD and OK would be central to the setting of Darklands, with Hobgoblins as DLC.
  • General_Hijalti#1213General_Hijalti#1213 Registered Users Posts: 6,119

    JungleElf said:

    Surge_2 said:

    Brizthom said:



    Why would half the game 3 map be the game 1/2 map?

    Because there's no point playing as Chaos if you don't get to invade the good guys.
    That's what the Immortal Empires map's for- I don't want to buy a game that's 50% what I already own.
    So you don't play Mortal Empires or you didn't own Game 1?
    Yes I own game 1, which is why I don't want to buy game 3 if it's 50% what I already own- I'll have Immortal Empires to play there, game 3's map should be almost all new land (with some of the east ME map in)
    IF parts of the Old World are included, it will most likely just be a part and heavily feature new settlements, routes and maybe even some new environs to battle in. There's no doubting that new areas will be the focus, though.

    This map was quite a nice fan-take on it:
    https://forums.totalwar.com/discussion/252843/updated-total-war-warhammer-3-theoretical-map-1-1/p1
    That's good, but it should go a bit further east to get the whole or most of the mountains of mourn.

    A bit more of the chaos wastes aswell.
    I don't see them do another Vortex and Immortal Empires structure. It means you have to update 2 maps, instead of offering the option to turn off story mode for a full sandbox experiance. Most players prefer to play Immortal Empires instead of Vortex and I fully expect one giant map (I believe they also said it would be "the biggest map". I think the Darklands will certainly be part of the map and represented, but as part of a bigger map.

    Theres still allot to add for game 1 and 2 factions that would sell allot better than Lord Packs for Ogre's and Chaos Dwarfs. Think of Verminlord, Valten, Fat Daemons, Gorbad/Gorfang, Election Counts, Lizards, Dwarf Airships and LL, DoW, High Elves; Korvik and Arsarnil ect ect.
    Not gonna happen they already same game 3 will have its own map.
    It also needs to otherwise all the base races will be starting in one corner and it will be wired.

    Lots of people like a more forcused smaller campaign without having to worry about people on the other side of the world.

    Also of you look at trophies it seems that vortex is played more.
  • Surge_2#1464Surge_2#1464 Registered Users Posts: 13,869

    JungleElf said:

    Surge_2 said:

    Brizthom said:



    Why would half the game 3 map be the game 1/2 map?

    Because there's no point playing as Chaos if you don't get to invade the good guys.
    That's what the Immortal Empires map's for- I don't want to buy a game that's 50% what I already own.
    So you don't play Mortal Empires or you didn't own Game 1?
    Yes I own game 1, which is why I don't want to buy game 3 if it's 50% what I already own- I'll have Immortal Empires to play there, game 3's map should be almost all new land (with some of the east ME map in)
    IF parts of the Old World are included, it will most likely just be a part and heavily feature new settlements, routes and maybe even some new environs to battle in. There's no doubting that new areas will be the focus, though.

    This map was quite a nice fan-take on it:
    https://forums.totalwar.com/discussion/252843/updated-total-war-warhammer-3-theoretical-map-1-1/p1
    That's good, but it should go a bit further east to get the whole or most of the mountains of mourn.

    A bit more of the chaos wastes aswell.
    I don't see them do another Vortex and Immortal Empires structure. It means you have to update 2 maps, instead of offering the option to turn off story mode for a full sandbox experiance. Most players prefer to play Immortal Empires instead of Vortex and I fully expect one giant map (I believe they also said it would be "the biggest map". I think the Darklands will certainly be part of the map and represented, but as part of a bigger map.

    Theres still allot to add for game 1 and 2 factions that would sell allot better than Lord Packs for Ogre's and Chaos Dwarfs. Think of Verminlord, Valten, Fat Daemons, Gorbad/Gorfang, Election Counts, Lizards, Dwarf Airships and LL, DoW, High Elves; Korvik and Arsarnil ect ect.
    Not gonna happen they already same game 3 will have its own map.
    It also needs to otherwise all the base races will be starting in one corner and it will be wired.

    Lots of people like a more forcused smaller campaign without having to worry about people on the other side of the world.

    Also of you look at trophies it seems that vortex is played more.
    If you want to base anything on trophies, its that the majority of players cannot or will not, finish a campaign.
    Kneel

  • General_Hijalti#1213General_Hijalti#1213 Registered Users Posts: 6,119

    JungleElf said:

    JungleElf said:

    Surge_2 said:

    Brizthom said:



    Why would half the game 3 map be the game 1/2 map?

    Because there's no point playing as Chaos if you don't get to invade the good guys.
    That's what the Immortal Empires map's for- I don't want to buy a game that's 50% what I already own.
    So you don't play Mortal Empires or you didn't own Game 1?
    Yes I own game 1, which is why I don't want to buy game 3 if it's 50% what I already own- I'll have Immortal Empires to play there, game 3's map should be almost all new land (with some of the east ME map in)
    IF parts of the Old World are included, it will most likely just be a part and heavily feature new settlements, routes and maybe even some new environs to battle in. There's no doubting that new areas will be the focus, though.

    This map was quite a nice fan-take on it:
    https://forums.totalwar.com/discussion/252843/updated-total-war-warhammer-3-theoretical-map-1-1/p1
    That's good, but it should go a bit further east to get the whole or most of the mountains of mourn.

    A bit more of the chaos wastes aswell.
    I don't see them do another Vortex and Immortal Empires structure. It means you have to update 2 maps, instead of offering the option to turn off story mode for a full sandbox experiance. Most players prefer to play Immortal Empires instead of Vortex and I fully expect one giant map (I believe they also said it would be "the biggest map". I think the Darklands will certainly be part of the map and represented, but as part of a bigger map.

    Theres still allot to add for game 1 and 2 factions that would sell allot better than Lord Packs for Ogre's and Chaos Dwarfs. Think of Verminlord, Valten, Fat Daemons, Gorbad/Gorfang, Election Counts, Lizards, Dwarf Airships and LL, DoW, High Elves; Korvik and Arsarnil ect ect.
    I see them doing it, since they said they're doing it.
    But there will be two maps, still. CA confirmed to do a narrative campaign map on every launch-version. The combined sandbox-map is a big bonus to all who've bought every entry of the trilogy.

    And, yes, the Immortal Empires map will probably add a lot of the game 3 zones (but a bit downsized) and adress player feedback to incorporate more of the left-out parts shown in the Vortex campaign.
    Ah really? Can you source me that statement? I never played the Vortex proper tbh. I did not have PC for part 2 at the start and now I just always play Mortal Empires. I think the incomplete and scaled down New World in Mortal Empires is quite lackluster and looks allot better in the Vortex. I think it's a bad idea to invest time in 2 seperate maps again and I rather see them create one full scale Mortal Empires map where you can be active on multiple fronts and map vision trough improved diplomacy.
    By the end of the trilogy, we intend there to be 5 massive campaigns to choose from across all three parts:



    The Old World Included in Warhammer I

    Eye of the Vortex Included in Warhammer II

    Mortal Empires Free Campaign for Owners of Parts 1 & 2

    Warhammer III’s Main Campaign Included in Warhammer III

    A Very Big Campaign* Free Campaign for Owners of Parts 1, 2 & 3


    *= Er, no, we’ve not decided on a name for this yet

    https://www.totalwar.com/blog/mortal-empires/
  • General_Hijalti#1213General_Hijalti#1213 Registered Users Posts: 6,119

    JungleElf said:

    JungleElf said:

    Surge_2 said:

    Brizthom said:



    Why would half the game 3 map be the game 1/2 map?

    Because there's no point playing as Chaos if you don't get to invade the good guys.
    That's what the Immortal Empires map's for- I don't want to buy a game that's 50% what I already own.
    So you don't play Mortal Empires or you didn't own Game 1?
    Yes I own game 1, which is why I don't want to buy game 3 if it's 50% what I already own- I'll have Immortal Empires to play there, game 3's map should be almost all new land (with some of the east ME map in)
    IF parts of the Old World are included, it will most likely just be a part and heavily feature new settlements, routes and maybe even some new environs to battle in. There's no doubting that new areas will be the focus, though.

    This map was quite a nice fan-take on it:
    https://forums.totalwar.com/discussion/252843/updated-total-war-warhammer-3-theoretical-map-1-1/p1
    That's good, but it should go a bit further east to get the whole or most of the mountains of mourn.

    A bit more of the chaos wastes aswell.
    I don't see them do another Vortex and Immortal Empires structure. It means you have to update 2 maps, instead of offering the option to turn off story mode for a full sandbox experiance. Most players prefer to play Immortal Empires instead of Vortex and I fully expect one giant map (I believe they also said it would be "the biggest map". I think the Darklands will certainly be part of the map and represented, but as part of a bigger map.

    Theres still allot to add for game 1 and 2 factions that would sell allot better than Lord Packs for Ogre's and Chaos Dwarfs. Think of Verminlord, Valten, Fat Daemons, Gorbad/Gorfang, Election Counts, Lizards, Dwarf Airships and LL, DoW, High Elves; Korvik and Arsarnil ect ect.
    I see them doing it, since they said they're doing it.
    But there will be two maps, still. CA confirmed to do a narrative campaign map on every launch-version. The combined sandbox-map is a big bonus to all who've bought every entry of the trilogy.

    And, yes, the Immortal Empires map will probably add a lot of the game 3 zones (but a bit downsized) and adress player feedback to incorporate more of the left-out parts shown in the Vortex campaign.
    Ah really? Can you source me that statement? I never played the Vortex proper tbh. I did not have PC for part 2 at the start and now I just always play Mortal Empires. I think the incomplete and scaled down New World in Mortal Empires is quite lackluster and looks allot better in the Vortex. I think it's a bad idea to invest time in 2 seperate maps again and I rather see them create one full scale Mortal Empires map where you can be active on multiple fronts and map vision trough improved diplomacy.
    https://www.totalwar.com/blog/mortal-empires/
  • JungleElf#8229JungleElf#8229 Registered Users Posts: 7,155

    JungleElf said:

    JungleElf said:

    Surge_2 said:

    Brizthom said:



    Why would half the game 3 map be the game 1/2 map?

    Because there's no point playing as Chaos if you don't get to invade the good guys.
    That's what the Immortal Empires map's for- I don't want to buy a game that's 50% what I already own.
    So you don't play Mortal Empires or you didn't own Game 1?
    Yes I own game 1, which is why I don't want to buy game 3 if it's 50% what I already own- I'll have Immortal Empires to play there, game 3's map should be almost all new land (with some of the east ME map in)
    IF parts of the Old World are included, it will most likely just be a part and heavily feature new settlements, routes and maybe even some new environs to battle in. There's no doubting that new areas will be the focus, though.

    This map was quite a nice fan-take on it:
    https://forums.totalwar.com/discussion/252843/updated-total-war-warhammer-3-theoretical-map-1-1/p1
    That's good, but it should go a bit further east to get the whole or most of the mountains of mourn.

    A bit more of the chaos wastes aswell.
    I don't see them do another Vortex and Immortal Empires structure. It means you have to update 2 maps, instead of offering the option to turn off story mode for a full sandbox experiance. Most players prefer to play Immortal Empires instead of Vortex and I fully expect one giant map (I believe they also said it would be "the biggest map". I think the Darklands will certainly be part of the map and represented, but as part of a bigger map.

    Theres still allot to add for game 1 and 2 factions that would sell allot better than Lord Packs for Ogre's and Chaos Dwarfs. Think of Verminlord, Valten, Fat Daemons, Gorbad/Gorfang, Election Counts, Lizards, Dwarf Airships and LL, DoW, High Elves; Korvik and Arsarnil ect ect.
    I see them doing it, since they said they're doing it.
    But there will be two maps, still. CA confirmed to do a narrative campaign map on every launch-version. The combined sandbox-map is a big bonus to all who've bought every entry of the trilogy.

    And, yes, the Immortal Empires map will probably add a lot of the game 3 zones (but a bit downsized) and adress player feedback to incorporate more of the left-out parts shown in the Vortex campaign.
    Ah really? Can you source me that statement? I never played the Vortex proper tbh. I did not have PC for part 2 at the start and now I just always play Mortal Empires. I think the incomplete and scaled down New World in Mortal Empires is quite lackluster and looks allot better in the Vortex. I think it's a bad idea to invest time in 2 seperate maps again and I rather see them create one full scale Mortal Empires map where you can be active on multiple fronts and map vision trough improved diplomacy.
    By the end of the trilogy, we intend there to be 5 massive campaigns to choose from across all three parts:



    The Old World Included in Warhammer I

    Eye of the Vortex Included in Warhammer II

    Mortal Empires Free Campaign for Owners of Parts 1 & 2

    Warhammer III’s Main Campaign Included in Warhammer III

    A Very Big Campaign* Free Campaign for Owners of Parts 1, 2 & 3


    *= Er, no, we’ve not decided on a name for this yet

    https://www.totalwar.com/blog/mortal-empires/
    Thank you! He quoted me and I tried to find the statement, but couldn't.
  • General_Hijalti#1213General_Hijalti#1213 Registered Users Posts: 6,119
    JungleElf said:

    JungleElf said:

    JungleElf said:

    Surge_2 said:

    Brizthom said:



    Why would half the game 3 map be the game 1/2 map?

    Because there's no point playing as Chaos if you don't get to invade the good guys.
    That's what the Immortal Empires map's for- I don't want to buy a game that's 50% what I already own.
    So you don't play Mortal Empires or you didn't own Game 1?
    Yes I own game 1, which is why I don't want to buy game 3 if it's 50% what I already own- I'll have Immortal Empires to play there, game 3's map should be almost all new land (with some of the east ME map in)
    IF parts of the Old World are included, it will most likely just be a part and heavily feature new settlements, routes and maybe even some new environs to battle in. There's no doubting that new areas will be the focus, though.

    This map was quite a nice fan-take on it:
    https://forums.totalwar.com/discussion/252843/updated-total-war-warhammer-3-theoretical-map-1-1/p1
    That's good, but it should go a bit further east to get the whole or most of the mountains of mourn.

    A bit more of the chaos wastes aswell.
    I don't see them do another Vortex and Immortal Empires structure. It means you have to update 2 maps, instead of offering the option to turn off story mode for a full sandbox experiance. Most players prefer to play Immortal Empires instead of Vortex and I fully expect one giant map (I believe they also said it would be "the biggest map". I think the Darklands will certainly be part of the map and represented, but as part of a bigger map.

    Theres still allot to add for game 1 and 2 factions that would sell allot better than Lord Packs for Ogre's and Chaos Dwarfs. Think of Verminlord, Valten, Fat Daemons, Gorbad/Gorfang, Election Counts, Lizards, Dwarf Airships and LL, DoW, High Elves; Korvik and Arsarnil ect ect.
    I see them doing it, since they said they're doing it.
    But there will be two maps, still. CA confirmed to do a narrative campaign map on every launch-version. The combined sandbox-map is a big bonus to all who've bought every entry of the trilogy.

    And, yes, the Immortal Empires map will probably add a lot of the game 3 zones (but a bit downsized) and adress player feedback to incorporate more of the left-out parts shown in the Vortex campaign.
    Ah really? Can you source me that statement? I never played the Vortex proper tbh. I did not have PC for part 2 at the start and now I just always play Mortal Empires. I think the incomplete and scaled down New World in Mortal Empires is quite lackluster and looks allot better in the Vortex. I think it's a bad idea to invest time in 2 seperate maps again and I rather see them create one full scale Mortal Empires map where you can be active on multiple fronts and map vision trough improved diplomacy.
    By the end of the trilogy, we intend there to be 5 massive campaigns to choose from across all three parts:



    The Old World Included in Warhammer I

    Eye of the Vortex Included in Warhammer II

    Mortal Empires Free Campaign for Owners of Parts 1 & 2

    Warhammer III’s Main Campaign Included in Warhammer III

    A Very Big Campaign* Free Campaign for Owners of Parts 1, 2 & 3


    *= Er, no, we’ve not decided on a name for this yet

    https://www.totalwar.com/blog/mortal-empires/
    Thank you! He quoted me and I tried to find the statement, but couldn't.
    No worries
  • SerPus#7395SerPus#7395 Registered Users Posts: 11,764
    Surge_2 said:

    Well, then I hope you enjoy Mountains, Wastes, a bit of Desert, a bit of Grasslands, and some Snow.

    Sounds quite awesome.
  • Surge_2#1464Surge_2#1464 Registered Users Posts: 13,869
    SerPus said:

    Surge_2 said:

    Well, then I hope you enjoy Mountains, Wastes, a bit of Desert, a bit of Grasslands, and some Snow.

    Sounds quite awesome.
    Yes, as entertaining as

    Snow, Jungle, Mystical Island, Wastes, Desert. AKA, Game 2.

    Or

    Temperate, Mountain, Wastes (badlands?) AKA, Game 1.

    Reducing the game to it's regional types is...probably not a worthwhile complaint, but even if we DO, a Game 3 with Mountains of Mourn, Dark Lands, Steppes, Snow, Wastes, and into part of the Southlands + Old World as I've argued for?

    Most Races.
    Most Factions.
    Most Terrain Types.
    Kneel

  • SerPus#7395SerPus#7395 Registered Users Posts: 11,764
    Surge_2 said:

    Reducing the game to it's regional types is...probably not a worthwhile complaint, but even if we DO, a Game 3 with Mountains of Mourn, Dark Lands, Steppes, Snow, Wastes, and into part of the Southlands + Old World as I've argued for?

    Remove the Southlands and the Old World and it would be fine.
  • Surge_2#1464Surge_2#1464 Registered Users Posts: 13,869
    edited December 2020
    SerPus said:

    Surge_2 said:

    Reducing the game to it's regional types is...probably not a worthwhile complaint, but even if we DO, a Game 3 with Mountains of Mourn, Dark Lands, Steppes, Snow, Wastes, and into part of the Southlands + Old World as I've argued for?

    Remove the Southlands and the Old World and it would be fine.
    Why? The North West East section of the South Lands could easily contribute to a Vortex Style campaign, and TEB would be a valuable addition as well. Game 1 didnt have a Vortex Mini Game. We could see updates to all the Game 1 Races, and good Campaigns if they are part of Game 3 Mini Game.



    Kneel

  • JungleElf#8229JungleElf#8229 Registered Users Posts: 7,155
    Lybaras and the like weren't featured on the Vortex map, I'd love them to appear on game 3's campaign map.
  • SerPus#7395SerPus#7395 Registered Users Posts: 11,764
    Surge_2 said:

    Why?

    Because we already had a whole game about the Old World and another one with the Southlands being 1/4th of the map.
  • Surge_2#1464Surge_2#1464 Registered Users Posts: 13,869
    SerPus said:

    Surge_2 said:

    Why?

    Because we already had a whole game about the Old World and another one with the Southlands being 1/4th of the map.
    And we have played Mortal Empire for years, and will continue to play Immortal Empire for years.

    So what?

    Cathay is to Humans, what Ulthuan is to Elves.

    Just a homogenous block of the same Race/Faction.
    Kneel

  • SerPus#7395SerPus#7395 Registered Users Posts: 11,764
    Surge_2 said:

    And we have played Mortal Empire for years, and will continue to play Immortal Empire for years.

    Exactly. So there is no reason to turn the standalone map into a shallow copy of the combined one.
Sign In or Register to comment.