I know this is a controversial topic here but I want you all to grant me this for the sake of argument and speculation.
I am one of the few people who thinks Sotek may be right about the Mono's being Daemons with Mortals to supplement them rather than True Monogods.
Now put aside you personal opinions on that take and Sotek himself an just assume it's accurate, What then?
Myself I can see it going this way:
Valkia, Villich & Festus all added to the Warriors of Chaos Race, All Given unique starts with Archaon, Kholek & Sigvald update in the process with the same unique starts.
From the Wording of older Blogs my assumption is that we'll see each Monogod Warriors Faction under their Named Champion, Such as Villich for Tzeentch will get access to both the Overhauled Warriors Mechanics but also the God Specific Resource and Mechanics, Villich getting Grimoires & Changeling of the Ways for example Sigvald getting Devotees, Valkia Skulls and so on.
I'd also expect them to get big bonusses with the MonoDaemon Races, Sigvald & N'Kari, Festus & Ku'Gath with the exception being bad relations between Valkia & Skarbrand.
I can also see each Mono-Warrior Faction getting unique units from the Mono-Daemons,
Valkia with Skullcrushers, Villich with Doom Knights, Sigvald with Hellstriders and the Unmounted Marauders and something new for Festus, Maybe Rotfly Knights or something.
Again, Just assume this is how things go,
Would you be satisfied?
Would you do things different?
7 ·
Comments
Some people can’t handle the truth.
- Report
1 · 19Disagree 1AgreeLet's try it another way - create a Khorne Lordpack with just Daemons (or even majority)... go on I'll wait...
- Report
14 · 4Disagree 14AgreeI know most people deny this as a possibility and they may well be right.
But this thread is about entertaining that possibly and how, if correct, it could be done well.
- Report
1 · 13Disagree 1AgreeI would put Mortal representatives of the Chaos Gods in their respective Chaos God race.
Update the Warriors of Chaos separately and add more Chaos Undivided characters to them.
- Report
7 · 1Disagree 7Agree- Report
16 · 3Disagree 16Agree- Anonymous
- Report
9 · 6Disagree 9AgreeThat they could instead pour all recourses into a single update to a single Race?
LPs have been a mainstay thus far but they take a long time and are very restrictive.
The way I see it why couldn't CA just add Valkia, Villich & Festus in One DLC along with Marked warriors for each God exclusive to the Mono Champions.
That potential Format of DLC would work great for the Vampires as well, One Big DLC that adds Neferata, Zacharias & Vorag with The Red Duke made Fully Playable as well.
Warhammer III looks to be an entirely different beast than I or II and I expect Surprises & Curveballs with how things are done at every step.
- Report
0 · 14Disagree Agree- Anonymous
- Report
7 · 3Disagree 7Agree- Report
3 · 3Disagree 3AgreeI honestly find it quite sad that you people aren't even capable of entertaining a hypothetical and thinking out how it could be done.
- Report
0 · 6Disagree Agree- Anonymous
- Report
4 · 2Disagree 4Agree- Report
4 · Disagree 4Agree- Report
9 · Disagree 9AgreeIf you're a person who believes that marked variants of the entire WoC roster are going to show up they could just as easily be added to the monogod rosters instead of in an update for WoC. And if you're a person who takes CA (and GWs) attempts to differentiate monogod placestyles as indicative that they won't be receiving copy pasted units from the WoC unless the units are appropriate both thematically and in gameplay then you functionally cannot hold this position since its a broad blending of multiple factions that CA (and GW) put a substantial amount of effort in rendering distinct.
This strategy does nothing other than make a bunch of content which reasonably should be for the core races of game three bizarrely part of a DLC for a 5 year old game. Beyond that it weakens the monogods by reducing the number of avaiable legendary lords for core factions. Even if Sigvald is pulled from WoC and moved to Slaanesh it would be trivial to get WoC and Norsca to 4 lords each, whereas the monogod factions have far fewer available options that are either current or not retconned away explicitly.
For the record my opposition to hordes of chaos makes this idea untenable. I would not be satisfied even before getting to the bizarre implementation.
- Report
4 · Disagree 4Agree- Report
11 · 3Disagree 11Agree- Report
3 · 1Disagree 3AgreeThen I'd merge WoC and Norsca into Chaos Undivided.
- Report
4 · Disagree 4AgreeWHAT IF THE MONOS REALLY ARE MONO-DAEMONS RATHER THAN MONO-GODS?
Than, either
A ) We aren't getting any DLC for the "Mono-Daemons"
-OR-
B ) CA is going to have to invent a lot more Daemons for each of the Gods.
- Report
8 · Disagree 8Agree- Report
4 · Disagree 4Agree- Report
5 · Disagree 5AgreeTzeentch with Chosen as a Frontline would be Utterly Broken.
And lest you forget, Nurgle got No Mortals at all baring Forsaken.
- Report
0 · 14Disagree Agree- Report
6 · Disagree 6AgreeNew Year --- New Anti-Monogods Troll Threads.
- Report
7 · Disagree 7AgreeA question for you: why the GW Forum and Reddit keeps posting wishlists of Monogods Contents, while nothing was made for the like of Kislev and Fantasy 3 Kingdoms? Because they have not enough contents from GW sources, novels, fanfictions or else, to even make a single, decent. . . mediocre TBH. . . Lord Pack for both.
A recent thread should have enlighted you already:
Yikes! CA already copy/pasted models in order to complete Kislev, the Fanmade Core. Bad news. . . since if CA is forced to copy/paste models already. . . how can they create a single LP for Fanmade-on-Ice?
The Fanmade Cores, are in such a bad shape. Objectively they have no room for a DLC. . . as sad as this looks like.
I'm confident they have like a couple of Lords, that can be added via FLCs. But in terms of units and sources? Ehhhh.
It's quite amusing how the Novel (Tamurkhan) of one of the so called "Quarter Cores" gave us multiple units of the current Fanmade Core Roster, called Cathay. This tells you alot about the importance of the Monogods (contents and sources included) and the future state of the 2 Fanmades.
Sure, CA can wait another half a decade before creating one mid-sized LP for the Fanmades, by expecting some bones for the two from The Old World. . . hopefully. But I'm afraid CA has not so much time to waste. A couple of FLC Lords for the Fanmades looks the only choice we can hope to see.
- Report
3 · 5Disagree 3AgreeFact is that all Daemon units are basically in the game except for Pleasureseekers and Blood Chariots.
We also already know that we have Monogods and not Monodaemons
- Report
6 · 2Disagree 6AgreeThe problem are the Fanmade Cores aka Kislev and Cathay.
Precisely because the Fanmade Cores are going to start small, with redundant copy/pasted units like Armored Kossars and the Guards, the roster-bloating bears or all the Jade Warrior clones. The idea to give them lots of DLC later doesn't really work. It's quite clear that CA and GW ended all their ideas with the base rosters, since a good 65-70% of the units are redundant clones.
A problem that the Monogods do not have to be extremely honest.
- Report
2 · 5Disagree 2Agree- Report
1 · 1Disagree 1AgreeAnd no, they're not making a dozen or so lord packs for Warriors of Chaos. They're a Warhammer 1 race, I mean, sure, they will probably get one if not two, but to cover everything that the Monos would bring you would need much more than that.
It's just bizarre that Sotek thinks how Monos are just an add on to the game 3 lineup, and that WoC are gonna be the main focus.
- Report
6 · Disagree 6AgreeAnyway, I disagree. If you want we can debate it? To start I point to the Mortals that already exist in Monos.
- Report
3 · 2Disagree 3AgreeI'd do it like this and use Sigvald as an example.
- Sigsy gets access to all Slaaanesh Demons, and all WoC stuff. Because he's the mortal champion of Slaanesh. It's the funnest option for him, thus it should happen.
As to whether or not I'd be satisfied? Probably not. I'm a fan of Monogods and I want them to get 1-2 Lord Packs each. The way you'd describe we wouldn't get as much content for them which would be bad to my mind at least.
- Report
4 · 2Disagree 4Agree