Welcome

Please register for Total War Access to use the forums. If you're an existing user, your forum details will be merged with Total War Access if you register with the same email or username. For more information please read our FAQ’s here.

Categories

warriors of chaos should be removed as a faction.

2

Comments

  • Mogwai_Man#4978Mogwai_Man#4978 Registered Users Posts: 6,400
    edited January 2022
    No, a hard no. Kholek isn't a Khorne character either.
  • afverrall#1754afverrall#1754 Registered Users Posts: 1,528
    No warriors of chaos need to stay a distinct faction for the mortal worshipers of chaos. Theres loads of characters and several units that are not god specific that need a home.
  • WarlockeWarlocke Registered Users Posts: 4,083
    @LennoxPoodle @lcmiracle

    I did not say in any way that Warriors of Chaos were not made up of Norscans from within their ranks. I’m not even sure how you read my post to arrive at that misapprehension.

    Warlocke said:

    In the lore, Norsca is not populated by Warriors of Chaos. It is home to the tribal culture of raiders who worship Chaos because of their proximity to the Chaos Wastes. They should and will remain separate.

    Yes. And in the lore, Clan Skryre and Clan Eshin are two Skaven clans with completely different cultures that live on opposite sides of the planet from each other, but they're still in the same faction.

    WoC and Norsca should be together because they have similar cultures, goals, common leaders, and fight together constantly.

    Norsca is literally "We took half of WoC's potential roster from it, and called it a new faction." Which can be cool provided both factions being split can be turned into something interesting on their own. But WoC ALREADY didn't have much going on to begin with!

    Literally everything that Norsca has other than Fimirs is stuff that should be in WoC.
    They live on opposite sides of the planet. So should Clan Eshin be placed in Clan Skyre’s starting location? If you think the answer is no, then your analogy has failed in its purpose.
    ò_ó
  • WarlockeWarlocke Registered Users Posts: 4,083
    Also, in WH3 you can subjugate Norsca, and then recruit their units, so there really is no reason to merge these factions at all.
    ò_ó
  • Commissar_G#7535Commissar_G#7535 Registered Users Posts: 16,365
    Warlocke said:

    Also, in WH3 you can subjugate Norsca, and then recruit their units, so there really is no reason to merge these factions at all.

    Even if you couldn’t that doesn’t justify the merger.
    MarcusLivius: You are indeed a lord of entitlement.
  • Bayes#3307Bayes#3307 Registered Users Posts: 5,468
    This is a bad idea it would not sit well with the fans. But I will say that undivided now being a thing makes this all very confusing.
  • Commissar_G#7535Commissar_G#7535 Registered Users Posts: 16,365
    Bayes said:

    This is a bad idea it would not sit well with the fans. But I will say that undivided now being a thing makes this all very confusing.

    How is it confusing?
    MarcusLivius: You are indeed a lord of entitlement.
  • Bayes#3307Bayes#3307 Registered Users Posts: 5,468

    Bayes said:

    This is a bad idea it would not sit well with the fans. But I will say that undivided now being a thing makes this all very confusing.

    How is it confusing?
    Because monogods + undivided are defined by what diety they follow, while beastmen and WoC are defined by the old chaos "species". It is inconsistent, and should not Archeon lead undivided chaos and not warriors?
  • Lunaticprince#9972Lunaticprince#9972 Registered Users Posts: 7,499
    Bayes said:

    Bayes said:

    This is a bad idea it would not sit well with the fans. But I will say that undivided now being a thing makes this all very confusing.

    How is it confusing?
    Because monogods + undivided are defined by what diety they follow, while beastmen and WoC are defined by the old chaos "species". It is inconsistent, and should not Archeon lead undivided chaos and not warriors?
    I think! archeon, will get a proper outpust system for chaos races, so he not do one of demon prince, more of he units all chaos under one banner.

    the others? no idea.


  • SerPus#7395SerPus#7395 Registered Users Posts: 11,764
    Bayes said:

    Because monogods + undivided are defined by what diety they follow, while beastmen and WoC are defined by the old chaos "species".

    We got 4 Monogods, Beastmen, WoC, DoC and Norsca.
  • Lunaticprince#9972Lunaticprince#9972 Registered Users Posts: 7,499
    edited January 2022
    I say no, Woc is a important faction in the warhammer universe.

    Just because ca screw them up not means they now need to be remove.


    But fixed!
    Post edited by Lunaticprince#9972 on


  • Bayes#3307Bayes#3307 Registered Users Posts: 5,468
    SerPus said:

    Bayes said:

    Because monogods + undivided are defined by what diety they follow, while beastmen and WoC are defined by the old chaos "species".

    We got 4 Monogods, Beastmen, WoC, DoC and Norsca.
    We do not have DoC. They might be called DoC but that is just to please the fans or something because clearly they are chaos undivided.
  • SerPus#7395SerPus#7395 Registered Users Posts: 11,764
    Bayes said:

    We do not have DoC.

    According to CA we do.
    Bayes said:

    because clearly they are chaos undivided.

    They it was Chaos Undivided then it would have WoC roster in addition to rosters of god-aligned races. It doesn't.
  • Bayes#3307Bayes#3307 Registered Users Posts: 5,468
    SerPus said:

    Bayes said:

    We do not have DoC.

    According to CA we do.
    Bayes said:

    because clearly they are chaos undivided.

    They it was Chaos Undivided then it would have WoC roster in addition to rosters of god-aligned races. It doesn't.
    I do not think even CA knows what they are.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uebto73ZUFQ&t=1s

    That is the weird part indeed, but they also are not daemons of chaos, so that is why I am so confused.
  • SerPus#7395SerPus#7395 Registered Users Posts: 11,764
    Bayes said:

    That is the weird part indeed, but they also are not daemons of chaos, so that is why I am so confused.

    They got a couple of mortals units and every daemon. They are simply DoC+.
  • Bayes#3307Bayes#3307 Registered Users Posts: 5,468
    SerPus said:

    Bayes said:

    That is the weird part indeed, but they also are not daemons of chaos, so that is why I am so confused.

    They got a couple of mortals units and every daemon. They are simply DoC+.
    I think it is pretty telling the MP roster is only daemons. The MP roster is daemons of chaos, the campaign roster is not. Which is why they are called chaos undivided in the trailer.

    Anyway it is semantics, it is not the chaos "species" sorting anyway.
  • HeresyHound#5667HeresyHound#5667 Registered Users Posts: 8,286
    Bayes said:

    SerPus said:

    Bayes said:

    That is the weird part indeed, but they also are not daemons of chaos, so that is why I am so confused.

    They got a couple of mortals units and every daemon. They are simply DoC+.
    I think it is pretty telling the MP roster is only daemons. The MP roster is daemons of chaos, the campaign roster is not. Which is why they are called chaos undivided in the trailer.

    Anyway it is semantics, it is not the chaos "species" sorting anyway.
    I'm going to go out on a limb and say that gaining the mortal followers is more of a Godslayer thing and Be'lakor if ever added as his own campaign start will have a roster like the MP one.
  • SerPus#7395SerPus#7395 Registered Users Posts: 11,764
    Bayes said:

    Which is why they are called chaos undivided in the trailer.

    CA refered to monogod races as "daemons" multiple time, so I don't think that it matters how they are called outside the game itself. After all, DoC are also Chaos Undivided in the sense that it combines all the alligments. What matters is that by calling them "Daemons of Chaos" in the game CA showed that they are a separate thing from WoC.
  • Bayes#3307Bayes#3307 Registered Users Posts: 5,468

    Bayes said:

    SerPus said:

    Bayes said:

    That is the weird part indeed, but they also are not daemons of chaos, so that is why I am so confused.

    They got a couple of mortals units and every daemon. They are simply DoC+.
    I think it is pretty telling the MP roster is only daemons. The MP roster is daemons of chaos, the campaign roster is not. Which is why they are called chaos undivided in the trailer.

    Anyway it is semantics, it is not the chaos "species" sorting anyway.
    I'm going to go out on a limb and say that gaining the mortal followers is more of a Godslayer thing and Be'lakor if ever added as his own campaign start will have a roster like the MP one.
    That would make sense, another thing I think would make sense is that the godslayer will not get mortals at launch? idk.
    SerPus said:

    Bayes said:

    Which is why they are called chaos undivided in the trailer.

    CA refered to monogod races as "daemons" multiple time, so I don't think that it matters how they are called outside the game itself. After all, DoC are also Chaos Undivided in the sense that it combines all the alligments. What matters is that by calling them "Daemons of Chaos" in the game CA showed that they are a separate thing from WoC.
    idk what you think I am implying? I am just pointing out that it is messy.

    Beastmen, WoC and DoC are the types, and undivided, khorne, slaanesh, nurgle and tzeentch are the alignments. But now we have this weird DoC thing which is sorted by alignment. Imagine both the undivded and undivided light but mainly daemons together that would be really weird.
  • CaesarSahlertzCaesarSahlertz Registered Users Posts: 7,073
  • SerPus#7395SerPus#7395 Registered Users Posts: 11,764
    Bayes said:

    Imagine both the undivded and undivided light but mainly daemons together that would be really weird.

    We have undivided(focused on mortals) and undivided(focused on daemons).
  • Bayes#3307Bayes#3307 Registered Users Posts: 5,468
    SerPus said:

    Bayes said:

    Imagine both the undivded and undivided light but mainly daemons together that would be really weird.

    We have undivided(focused on mortals) and undivided(focused on daemons).
    Yes we do, but we also have. Undivided (purely mortals) and undivided(also mortals). That is the problem. It is a bit like having daemons and humans in the beastmen army.
  • Lord_Zarkov#7252Lord_Zarkov#7252 Registered Users Posts: 2,512

    Bayes said:

    SerPus said:

    Bayes said:

    That is the weird part indeed, but they also are not daemons of chaos, so that is why I am so confused.

    They got a couple of mortals units and every daemon. They are simply DoC+.
    I think it is pretty telling the MP roster is only daemons. The MP roster is daemons of chaos, the campaign roster is not. Which is why they are called chaos undivided in the trailer.

    Anyway it is semantics, it is not the chaos "species" sorting anyway.
    I'm going to go out on a limb and say that gaining the mortal followers is more of a Godslayer thing and Be'lakor if ever added as his own campaign start will have a roster like the MP one.
    I think this is fairly likely tbh - as he wouldn’t be customisable it wouldn’t make sense to have the customisation page that is what determines what units you can recruit (and Be’lakor shouldn’t get to dedicate himself to a single god anyway). Having slightly less units total in return for less restrictive selections seems fair tbh.

  • SerPus#7395SerPus#7395 Registered Users Posts: 11,764
    Bayes said:

    Undivided (purely mortals)

    Who told you that WoC won't get some daemons through their mechanics?
  • Bayes#3307Bayes#3307 Registered Users Posts: 5,468
    SerPus said:

    Bayes said:

    Undivided (purely mortals)

    Who told you that WoC won't get some daemons through their mechanics?
    I am talking about what we have right now and how the new races fit in. We do not know what the future might hold, not sure why that matters.
  • CaesarSahlertzCaesarSahlertz Registered Users Posts: 7,073
    I see that fans of certain factions are still extremely salty about recent relevations...
  • Bayes#3307Bayes#3307 Registered Users Posts: 5,468

    I see that fans of certain factions are still extremely salty about recent relevations...

    you are projecting.
  • SerPus#7395SerPus#7395 Registered Users Posts: 11,764
    Bayes said:

    not sure why that matters.

    Because WoC that we currently have were made 6 years ago and they weren't updated yet. So rather than thinking how new races will fit in something that was established in TWW1, we should consider how updated WoC would fit in realities of TWW3.
  • Bayes#3307Bayes#3307 Registered Users Posts: 5,468
    SerPus said:

    Bayes said:

    not sure why that matters.

    Because WoC that we currently have were made 6 years ago and they weren't updated yet. So rather than thinking how new races will fit in something that was established in TWW1, we should consider how updated WoC would fit in realities of TWW3.
    I think that is fair, then atleast it would be consistent. Would like them all to mix together more then?
  • lcmiracle#6727lcmiracle#6727 Registered Users Posts: 1,387
    Warlocke said:

    @LennoxPoodle @lcmiracle

    I did not say in any way that Warriors of Chaos were not made up of Norscans from within their ranks. I’m not even sure how you read my post to arrive at that misapprehension.



    You wrote Norsca was not populated by WoCs, which it was -- it might not be all WoCs, but WoCs lived there. Just by the story of Wulfrik it's clear there were WoCs who lived as Chaos Lords and champions. The Norscans weren't just worshippers of WoCs, WoCs were also norscans. No one misinterpreted you.
Sign In or Register to comment.