POM (persons of mass) and their representation in TWW3

Yeetasaurus#9774

Fat LLs in TWW3 are ALWAYS represented as disgusting pigs, gluttonous and vile. All of these fat LLs are males, except for one. Cylostra.
How does Cylostra fit into this fantasy epic? She's just a grotesquely fat singer, after all. Well, the answer is clear, it's because fat people are funny. Her being a lard-ass is the joke and the satire. LOL? Is it funny because she's fat and that's really all there is to it?
Is this really the representation that fat people in TWW3 get?

I think it's clear. We should petition a redesign of Cylostra to make her a more realistic representation of the female form, rather than some grossly obese diabetic. It's time to put Cylostra on a zero calorie diet and slim her down. If the game is going to be satirical then great, we either do it properly by mocking all groups, or we stop using grotesquely fat people as comedic meat-shields.

What next, are we going to have a fat LL roll around in a wheelbarrow? Oh wait....

Surge_2#1464

Please tell me "persons of mass" is not a real thing.

Yeetasaurus#9774

Surge_2#1464 said:

Please tell me "persons of mass" is not a real thing.

Yes, it's important to use this terminology because not all large people are 'fat'. They might just be big boned, therefore referring to them as 'massive' makes more sense if we're trying to be inclusive while simultaneously do away with the word 'fat' which is a derogatory slur.

Red_Dox#2328

And god forbid a opera ghost is not slim as an elven princess. God forbid there might be other beauty norms in different centuries, or a fantasy world.

One of the most stupid topics in quite some time if not pure troll bait to start with.

------Red Dox

#57875

Yeetasaurus#9774 said:

Surge_2#1464 said:

Please tell me "persons of mass" is not a real thing.

Yes, it's important to use this terminology because not all large people are 'fat'. They might just be big boned, therefore referring to them as 'massive' makes more sense if we're trying to be inclusive while simultaneously do away with the word 'fat' which is a derogatory slur.

what about PoiH (persons of inadequate height) ? and dont say "short" bc that is derogatory.







lol

Reeks#2417

Disgusting flame bait

Mr_Finley7#4571

Fake woke this is either bait or a gen z’er

Heretical_Cactus#7598

Yeetasaurus#9774 said:

Fat LLs in TWW3 are ALWAYS represented as disgusting pigs, gluttonous and vile. All of these fat LLs are males, except for one. Cylostra.
How does Cylostra fit into this fantasy epic? She's just a grotesquely fat singer, after all. Well, the answer is clear, it's because fat people are funny. Her being a lard-ass is the joke and the satire. LOL? Is it funny because she's fat and that's really all there is to it?
Is this really the representation that fat people in TWW3 get?

I think it's clear. We should petition a redesign of Cylostra to make her a more realistic representation of the female form, rather than some grossly obese diabetic. It's time to put Cylostra on a zero calorie diet and slim her down. If the game is going to be satirical then great, we either do it properly by mocking all groups, or we stop using grotesquely fat people as comedic meat-shields.

What next, are we going to have a fat LL roll around in a wheelbarrow? Oh wait....

Heretical_Cactus#7598

Wunderb0r#2088 said:

Yeetasaurus#9774 said:

Surge_2#1464 said:

Please tell me "persons of mass" is not a real thing.

Yes, it's important to use this terminology because not all large people are 'fat'. They might just be big boned, therefore referring to them as 'massive' makes more sense if we're trying to be inclusive while simultaneously do away with the word 'fat' which is a derogatory slur.

what about PoiH (persons of inadequate height) ? and dont say "short" bc that is derogatory.







lol

Easy: Stunties

#57875

Heretical_Cactus#7598 said:

Wunderb0r#2088 said:

Yeetasaurus#9774 said:

Surge_2#1464 said:

Please tell me "persons of mass" is not a real thing.

Yes, it's important to use this terminology because not all large people are 'fat'. They might just be big boned, therefore referring to them as 'massive' makes more sense if we're trying to be inclusive while simultaneously do away with the word 'fat' which is a derogatory slur.

what about PoiH (persons of inadequate height) ? and dont say "short" bc that is derogatory.







lol

Easy: Stunties

is that a personal attack or something?

Surge_2#1464

Yeetasaurus#9774 said:

Surge_2#1464 said:

Please tell me "persons of mass" is not a real thing.

Yes, it's important to use this terminology because not all large people are 'fat'. They might just be big boned, therefore referring to them as 'massive' makes more sense if we're trying to be inclusive while simultaneously do away with the word 'fat' which is a derogatory slur.

#62422

Yeetasaurus#9774 said:

Surge_2#1464 said:

Please tell me "persons of mass" is not a real thing.

Yes, it's important to use this terminology because not all large people are 'fat'. They might just be big boned, therefore referring to them as 'massive' makes more sense if we're trying to be inclusive while simultaneously do away with the word 'fat' which is a derogatory slur.

Big Boned ok then Cartman. If you believe that you'll believe anything.

There is some serious self loathing and projection going on in all of these "fat hating" threads, or do you just really really hate fat women that much?

Shall we put you on a watch list for serial killers?

Heretical_Cactus#7598

Wunderb0r#2088 said:

Heretical_Cactus#7598 said:

Wunderb0r#2088 said:

Yeetasaurus#9774 said:

Surge_2#1464 said:

Please tell me "persons of mass" is not a real thing.

Yes, it's important to use this terminology because not all large people are 'fat'. They might just be big boned, therefore referring to them as 'massive' makes more sense if we're trying to be inclusive while simultaneously do away with the word 'fat' which is a derogatory slur.

what about PoiH (persons of inadequate height) ? and dont say "short" bc that is derogatory.







lol

Easy: Stunties

is that a personal attack or something?

Don't worry, I'm small too

Veldrinar#2882

By that logic we should petition to redesign all ''unrealistic'' body proportions to be more realistic. Whether it be fat, skinny, bark-made, green of skin, scaly, tall, short, furry, furry with horns, horny without fur(looking at you Slaanesh), ethereal, ephmereal, daemonical, skeletal, rotting, mummified, draconic, pointy eared, fanged, winged and the worst offender of all...Painfully average.

This post is stupid, your post is stupid, the thread is stupid. Good day, sir.

Seswatha#7633

Please tell me it's a troll. I don't want to lose my faith in humanity completely.

DarthEnderX-#6513

As a Person Of Unusual Size, it's disappointing all the fatties are either gross Nurglites or gross Ogres.

Need a Halfling LL!

davedave1124#4773

This thread is like honey for the ‘PC gone mad’ type.

Nygrael#4849

Bad bait...

Beast_of_Guanyin#8747

Yeetasaurus#9774 said:

Surge_2#1464 said:

Please tell me "persons of mass" is not a real thing.

Yes, it's important to use this terminology because not all large people are 'fat'. They might just be big boned, therefore referring to them as 'massive' makes more sense if we're trying to be inclusive while simultaneously do away with the word 'fat' which is a derogatory slur.

That's just stupid bruh.

Beast_of_Guanyin#8747

Wunderb0r#2088 said:

Yeetasaurus#9774 said:

Surge_2#1464 said:

Please tell me "persons of mass" is not a real thing.

Yes, it's important to use this terminology because not all large people are 'fat'. They might just be big boned, therefore referring to them as 'massive' makes more sense if we're trying to be inclusive while simultaneously do away with the word 'fat' which is a derogatory slur.

what about PoiH (persons of inadequate height) ? and dont say "short" bc that is derogatory.







lol

Excuse you, the term is vertically challenged.

dge1

Closed, with prejudice.