Related to
https://forums.totalwar.com/discussion/330859/missing-strategic-location-markers-for-several-factionsI was asked by CA_Tama to split these per race so that's what i'll be doing:
Missing strategic location marker on
Lothern, even though they have access to the
Straits of Lothern building:

There's a strategic location marker on
Bordeleaux showing a regular Elven Haven (the regular port building they can make in all coastal settlements). They either need access to the special port, or the marker should be removed:

Same goes for
Marienburg, strategic location marker with a regular Elven Haven. They either need access to the special port, or the marker should be removed:

And also
Erengrad. They either need access to the special port, or the marker should be removed:

There's a strategic location marker for the
The Great Temple of Hashut (Desecrated) in Zharr Naggrund, but Wood Elves can't actually build the landmark. Either the strategic location marker should be removed and the building removed from the building browser, or the landmark should be made available to Wood Elves:


There are no strategic location markers next to any of the settlements in Athel Loren, even though Vaul's Anvil, Waterfall Palace, Crag Halls of Findol and King's Glade all four need one and all four need the landmarks linked that are available to Heralds of Ariel & Talsyn, and Argwylon & Wargrove of Woe:
Comments
the strategic location marker in Gryphon Wood currently says "Overgrown Temple of Ereth Khial", which should be "Temple of Ereth Khial":
You can use the same save from above.
- Report
0 · Disagree AgreeThanks for these, have sent them off to be investigated
Tama ^-^
- Report
1 · Disagree 1Agree