Please register for Total War Access to use the forums. If you're an existing user, your forum details will be merged with Total War Access if you register with the same email or username. For more information please read our FAQ’s here.
Can only build 4-6 types of buildings in your city?
AnnonDev wrote: »
Thank you, have you noticed that we are 8 pages in and so far there haven't been any fanboys here...perhaps the facts put in the way I have has driven them away.
Also notice that this hasn't been moved yet, a good sign from CA so far.
A post from Trish would be a helpful sign.
scfs123 wrote: »
Wargame airland battle?
Lusiad wrote: »
Has there been any feedback from CA yet?ive been trying to keep an eye on anything they may be looking at addressing after watching the various threads in this forum.
1. Community system diversity
Symptoms: Bugs/glitches/graphical issues/crashes/etc.
Symptoms: Game play issues/Battle and Campaign AI/content/etc.
3. Developer Choices
Symptoms: Gameplay mechanics/content/lore/historical accuracy
Kross wrote: »
As you said yourself, this is to be expected and will be addressed with the all of the information CA is able to gather now.
These complaints are mostly just your personal preferences. There are a lot more people playing the game right now than there are people whining about it on the forums. You do the math.
Overall rating: poor
You make a 'pretty' post stating the obvious plus a lot of opinionated ranting.
Your most crucial error is that, after reading, I have nothing to take away from this. I don't know what you wanted.
All I see is a guy blowing smoke up his own **** and bashing CA to gain praise from the forum haters to boost his own ego.
You call yourself a developer to invoke ethos but fail to provide any proof, or indeed even an argument which this is intended to support. Again, just blowing smoke up your own ****.
You go on to praise modders, then choose to name the one who is most famous for doing the least.
You say you hope to see replies from some enlightened thinkers. Well, we are here, and we are wondering what the point of this was.
KillZone96EN wrote: »
You know he's true, patches will make this game better and modders will make this game better. If you enjoy 5 minute tacti-lol scrums (among many other things) instead of a real battle then I feel sorely sorry for you.
Kross wrote: »
Yes, patches will make the game better. That's what I said.
As for the rest, the fact remains that this is your personal opinion. The OP did not write a constructive and objective review, he wrote his own personal opinions along with a lot of judgement.
Judging by the number of people playing the game right now, the game stands on its own.
Sure, it's a shame that it does not cater to the individual needs of the couple hundred people complaining on the forums right now, but that does not make the game bad.
Every complaint I have read on the forums in the past few days have either been bugs, which you always have and which will be addressed in time, or the fact that the game doesn't match the needs and expectations of the individual.
I have seen no constructive or objective concerns raised beside the graphics/bugs issues, and it's frankly shameful and pathetic that people will not admit that the game stands on it's own, just because it doesn't suit their preferences. This 'review' is no different.
Also, you lot keep saying that modders will 'improve' the game, but the very point of modding is to customize and personalize it to your needs. It's right there in your face: Your issues with the game are based in your own personal preferences, not issues with the game.