Last couple of days were a river of hate and blame because of the Kislev and Khorne roster reveals with people claiming they won't buy the game (but they will) and i've asked myself why.
We've seen them, we know they are small, we know some units are missing but we complain. Why? Didn't we take the exact same route 2 times already? Did WH1 bring full roster factions? Did WH2 do it? No. "We did get more units" some will say but i will gladly take a smaller roster with unique units rather than 3 variants of archers that i'll never use.
The big issue that in think caused this complain is that people compare the new races of WH3 with reworked and improved races from previous games that needed several years and DLC's to get to what they are today.
People complaining also fail to see that we will get 6 core factions which means 50% more content on day 1. Just wait and with time and DLC's we will get other mounts for Kislev or Marauders for Khorne just like we got missing units for previous races.
"I will not buy this game"
Ok. It's your money, nobody forces you but you make an decision based on what? 2 rosters? How can someone decide if it's worth it or not when at this point we don't have: gameplay footage, campaign map, game mechanics, all other roster revealed. Heck, we don't even know the launch date!
People, you enjoyed WH1 & WH2. You spent hundreds or thousands of hours in them and suddently you reject game 3 and i ask again: Based on what?