Please register for Total War Access to use the forums. If you're an existing user, your forum details will be merged with Total War Access if you register with the same email or username. For more information please read our FAQ’s here.
Yes, they are, and CA didn't have to make it that way but they decided chaos was important enough to add another four races to the trilogy. The post that started this thread talks about how chaos as … (View Post)
I think it's worth pointing out that we're getting four god-based races as opposed to a single (albeit bigger) DoC race, in addition to already existing Beastmen, WoC and Norsca (the latter two are i… (View Post)
I get that Cathay's treatment opens new doors in the franchise, and I agree that GW should expand on a lot of the more vague parts of their worldbuilding, but tbh even with game 3 potentially getting… (View Post)
I don't know dude this "generic fantasy China" argument feels like getting upset at Troy for featuring classic Greek mythology fantastical creatures. Even the little we knew about old Catha… (View Post)
I think Nagash would make the most sense as a "character important enough to be the sole LL of a small additional race" after Be'lakor. Not sure the 'champion' plot would suit him so well..… (View Post)